Conversation
6aacbbd to
859172d
Compare
|
Weird - I don't see a "draft" option for this PR, maybe because |
Not yet - I'll need to push the past versions into the |
Roger! I guess that is why you wanted to set it to DRAFT! Just ping me if you want a second set of eyes or to merge in. Thanks again for making this update - I know you are in high demand! |
|
I'll revisit this after the upcoming release. Do not want to disrupt anything that way. |
|
This Pull Request is stale because it has not been worked on in 15 days. |
|
@cicdguy think we can proceed with this PR now. admiral was released on January 15th with no issues identified...so far. |
|
Will the links not be an issue once this is merged into main - the ones with |
|
@bms63 - yes those links will all be updated. There's some other background work required to finish this end-to-end (re-provisioning older version on |
|
Update from @cicdguy: progress on this expected by end of month |
|
This Pull Request is stale because it has not been worked on in 15 days. |
|
This Pull Request is stale because it has not been worked on in 15 days. |
|
@cicdguy now that docs are built successfully, i guess this is almost done? 🙏 |
|
Almost ready to go. Just need to resolve an issue with Staged Dependencies for tag-based events. |
|
@cicdguy how is this going? |
|
Going good. Tests are running fine. We should be good to merge. |
|
Ok I'll resolve the conflicts and merge tomorrow if no other comments! Edit: conflicts already resolved |
|
Thanks @cicdguy 😄 |
Oh snap. I resolved it (I think). |
|
Hmm coverage still unhappy :( |
|
Darn, let me fix that. |
|
not sure if it's you, seeing it on other PRs |
|
Yeah it's my bad. Need to fix |
3eff678 to
ca8f9b6
Compare
|
Ok should be fixed now. |
okay to merge this in? we still will have dev version of site? |
|
Yes. Exactly |
|
@cicdguy thanks again!!! |
|
@cicdguy any chance we can not have |
|
Yes, change your tag/DESCRIPTION to the correct version: https://github.com/pharmaverse/admiral/blob/v1.2.0/DESCRIPTION#L4 v1.2.0 has 1.2.0.9000 in the DESCRIPTION file :) |
|
ah darn that is on me then. ummm.. |
|
@bms63 , I think there went something wrong. The older versions were removed and the |
|
@cicdguy could we get some pointers? I just modified the tag-v1.2.0 and then did a re-release on the updated tag. |
|
Ouch. Yeah that's bad. I'll look into it next week or so. |




Reintroduces the multiversion docs feature per @manciniedoardo's request.
The change was reverted in ee3e5b1 per @pharmaverse/admiral's decision.
This PR will reintroduce multiversion docs.
See examples where this is successfully used: